Qutub Minar is not a place of worship, it cannot be called a temple – know what ASI said in court


Qutub Minar Row: There is a debate going on across the country regarding religious places and monuments. Meanwhile, a hearing was held in the court and the decision has been reserved. But during the hearing, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) filed its reply in the court. Also made it clear that Qutub Minar is not a place of worship but a monument and its current status cannot be changed. On June 9, the court will pronounce its verdict in this matter. Know what happened in the court on this matter.

  1. In fact, a petition was filed in the court to restore the idols of Hindu and Jain deities inside the Qutub Minar complex, which has been opposed by the ASI. The ASI rejected outright that there was a temple here and worship could be done at Qutub Minar.
  2. Advertisement

  3. Additional District Judge Nikhil Chopra in the court observed that the main issue arising out of the petition is the “right to worship”, and questioned how any person can claim a legal right for restoration of something which is 800 Happened years ago.
  4. The ASI said it would be contrary to law to agree with the contention of any person claiming the fundamental right to worship at the “centrally protected” monument. The ASI also said that the idols of Hindu and Jain deities were reused in the construction of the Qutb complex.
  5. Advertisement

  6. The ASI said, “The fundamental right cannot be availed of by violating the status of the land in any way. The basic principle of conservation is not to allow any new practice to be introduced in a monument which has been declared as a protected and notified monument under the law.
  7. The ASI said that the resumption of worship is not allowed at any place where this worship was not in practice while the monument was taken under protection. Qutub Minar is not a place of worship and since its patronage by the central government, no part of Qutub Minar or Qutub Minar was under the worship of any community.
  8. Advertisement

  9. On the other hand, Delhi Waqf Board chairman Amanatullah Khan, in a letter to the Director General of ASI, has requested permission to offer prayers at the “ancient” Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque in the Qutub Minar complex, claiming that it is being held by ASI officials. had stopped.
  10. During the hearing, ASI’s counsel Subhash Gupta said that it is very clear from the Persian inscription in the Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque that it was built from the carved pillars and other architecture of 27 temples.
  11. The lawyer said, “It is clear from the inscription that the mosque was built from the remains of these temples. But nowhere is it mentioned that the material was found by demolishing the temples. Also, it is not clear whether they were acquired from the same site or brought from outside.
  12. Gupta said that under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act, there is no such provision under which worship can be started in a monument. The purpose of the law is clear that the monument should be preserved in its original condition for posterity. Therefore, any change in the existing structure would be a clear violation of the AMASR Act and as such should not be allowed.
  13. During the hearing, the court said that there are many such monuments in South India, which are not being used and worship is not being done. The judge asked, “Now you want the memorial to be converted into a temple. My question is how can you claim a legal right to restore something that happened 800 years ago.

read this also –

Gyanvapi Masjid Case: ‘Gyanvapi campus should be handed over to Hindus,’ hearing on new petition filed in Varanasi District Court today

Mosque Row: Massive ruckus in Mangaluru, VHP workers worshiped outside the mosque, police detained, Section 144 imposed

Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *